Fox News – Breaking News Updates

latest news and breaking news today

What is 35/50 as a percentage? (Convert 35/50 to percent)

source :

What is 35/50 as a percentage? (Convert 35/50 to percent)

It’s very common when learning about fractions to want to know how convert a fraction like 35/50 into a percentage. In this step-by-step guide, we’ll show you how to turn any fraction into a percentage really easily. Let’s take a look!

Want to quickly learn or show students how to convert 35/50 to a percentage? Play this very quick and fun video now!

Before we get started in the fraction to percentage conversion, let’s go over some very quick fraction basics. Remember that a numerator is the number above the fraction line, and the denominator is the number below the fraction line. We’ll use this later in the tutorial.

When we are using percentages, what we are really saying is that the percentage is a fraction of 100. “Percent” means per hundred, and so 50% is the same as saying 50/100 or 5/10 in fraction form.

So, since our denominator in 35/50 is 50, we could adjust the fraction to make the denominator 100. To do that, we divide 100 by the denominator:

100 ÷ 50 = 2

Once we have that, we can multiple both the numerator and denominator by this multiple:

35 x 2
50 x 2



Now we can see that our fraction is 70/100, which means that 35/50 as a percentage is 70%.

We can also work this out in a simpler way by first converting the fraction 35/50 to a decimal. To do that, we simply divide the numerator by the denominator:

35/50 = 0.7

Once we have the answer to that division, we can multiply the answer by 100 to make it a percentage:

0.7 x 100 = 70%

And there you have it! Two different ways to convert 35/50 to a percentage. Both are pretty straightforward and easy to do, but I personally prefer the convert to decimal method as it takes less steps.

I’ve seen a lot of students get confused whenever a question comes up about converting a fraction to a percentage, but if you follow the steps laid out here it should be simple. That said, you may still need a calculator for more complicated fractions (and you can always use our calculator in the form below).

If you want to practice, grab yourself a pen, a pad, and a calculator and try to convert a few fractions to a percentage yourself.

Hopefully this tutorial has helped you to understand how to convert a fraction to a percentage. You can now go forth and convert fractions to percentages as much as your little heart desires!

Cite, Link, or Reference This Page

If you found this content useful in your research, please do us a great favor and use the tool below to make sure you properly reference us wherever you use it. We really appreciate your support!

<a href=””>What is 35/50 as a percentage?</a>

“What is 35/50 as a percentage?”. Accessed on April 19, 2021.

“What is 35/50 as a percentage?”., Accessed 19 April, 2021.

What is 35/50 as a percentage?. Retrieved from

Fraction to Percentage Calculator

Fraction as Percentage

Enter a numerator and denominator

Next Fraction to Percentage Calculation

Express 35/50 as a percentage - Percentage Calculator

Express 35/50 as a percentage – Percentage Calculator – The fraction 35/50 is equivalent to 70 percent. To workout this, divide the numerator by the denominator, sum this value to the integer part then multiply the result by 100%, so: 35/50 in percent = 35 ÷ 50 × 100% = 0.7 × 100% =Free math problem solver answers your algebra, geometry, trigonometry, calculus, and statistics homework questions with step-by-step explanations, just like a math tutor.6 decimal number to percent: 6 × 100 = 600%; 15 decimal number to percent: 33 decimal number to percent: 33.333 decimal number to percent: 77.5 decimal number to percent: 100 decimal number to percent: 125 decimal number to percent: Maths formula from percentage into decimal result – First divide the number in percent by 100 value, then take

Convert to a Percentage 35/50 | Mathway – To find what percentage 35 is of 50, the first step is to divide 35 by 50. This is because 35 is the smaller number, and you want to know what portion of 50 it is.To write 35/50 as a decimal you have to divide numerator by the denominator of the fraction. We divide now 35 by 50 what we write down as 35/50 and we get 0.7 And finally we have: 35/50 as a decimal equals 0.7In other words, a 20% discount for an item with original price of £35.50 is equal to £7.1 (Amount Saved). Note that to find the amount saved, just multiply it by the percentage and divide by 100. Supose Have you received a ROBLOX promotional code of 20 percent of discount.

Convert to a Percentage 35/50 | Mathway

Percentages calculator | % equivalent | Percent numbers – 35 is 50% of 70. Steps to solve "35 is 50 percent of what number?" We have, 50% × x = 35; or, 50 / 100 × x = 35 Multiplying both sides by 100 and dividing both sides by 50, we have x = 35 × 100 / 50 x = 70. If you are using a calculator, simply enter 35×100÷50, which will give you the answer.35/50 in percentage form is 70%. If you were to scale this on a general marking scheme it would be around a B. Wills scored 35 out of 50 what was wills percentage score? 70%.5% of 35.00 = 1.7500: 5% of 35.25 = 1.7625: 5% of 35.50 = 1.7750: 5% of 35.75 = 1.7875: 5% of 35.01 = 1.7505: 5% of 35.26 = 1.7630: 5% of 35.51 = 1.7755: 5% of 35.76

Community Hospital had 275 discharges in July There were ...
Crack your salary slip
Unit 1 notes.pdf - Name Unit Percents Student Handout 1 ...
88 As A Fraction In Simplest Form
88 As A Fraction In Simplest Form
88 As A Fraction In Simplest Form
SPU: Renal Transplantation Among Patients With Congenital ...
Use the Percent Circle to Solve Percent Problems - dummies
SOLVED:General Motors stock fell from \ 32 per sh…
88 As A Fraction In Simplest Form
88 As A Fraction In Simplest Form

Native American Fishweir – Bob: Well here is John Peters, who is the Executive Director of
the Commission on Native American Affairs for the Commonwealth of
Great to see you. John: Well thank you, thank you. It's a great day to be down here celebrating the Fishweir and all the other festivities that go on here in June. You know, I like to
think about this Fishweir here. 4500 years ago they found some sticks down here when they
were doing the trolley station over there underground. 45 feet down they found these sticks in the ground and finally figured out that it was a fishweir. Bob: So, can you tell us what a fishweir is? John: It is a way of fishing, you know, how we caught fish in those
days. You know, the tide came in, and fish are on cycles and when they come in in schools we drive them towards the fishweir and push them over the top so that we are able to clean them later and dry them so that they'll last us for a few months at
a time. You know, we're hunters and gatherers, so when the fish
come you have to be there to get them and harvest them and prepare
them for the months to come. Bob: What's life like for Native Americans in Massachusetts now? What can you tell us? John: Well, we're like everybody else I would say, except that we're still struggling and fighting for our rights here in
Massachusetts, and trying to help our future generations
to hang on to the culture that has been here. Our blood comes from this land, we can trace our lineage to before there was an America here, right down there where I live in Mashpee. So, we want to carry on that tradition, it's only been 400 years, less than. So, things have changed in such a rapid pace, you
know, even in my lifetime things have changed
so dramatically, but this is America and that's what it's about.
Bob: Well thank you, thank you for sharing, and thank you for preserving this important
part of American history. John: And this is very important, that everybody has a chance to see that, and you know, you look at the blue lines out
there and that's where the waterfront used to be. And we didn't have all these
buildings and so forth, they would've been under water. (Native American music) Ross Miller: You know if we were walking along here 4500 years ago, there would be a structure like this that we could see in the tidal area. But it wouldn't
be grass like this, we would actually be looking out over here at the ocean. But this is a fishweir, a rebuilding of a fishweir, that's based on some structures they started to discover in
1911 over here at Boylston St. when they
were digging for the subway. And they were down 27 to 40 feet
below the surface, they started finding wooden stakes, not little ones like this, but more big
ones, maybe an inch and a half, two inches in diameter. And they first started finding a few of them,
and then they founds tens of them, and then they started finding thousands of
these wooden sticks. And they're thinking, you know, maybe these were part of a
fence for Native Americans or something.
And then with the subsequent archaeological work, they start to
understand these were part of a seasonal fishing structure. They were
built at the time of year within the Wampanoag
culture, the fish return to spawn, when, they say, the fish return to spawn when the oak leaf is
about as big as a mouse's ear. So, if you look around and you see the
oak leaf just beginning, at that time that's the same part of
the season when the fish would return to spawn. Bob: Now, what kind of fish are we talking about? Ross: Small things similar to a herring or
a mummichog or and what we would think of as a bait fish now. And they would come in on the high tide and they would school around in this area on the up-shore side of the fishweir, and then as the ocean would go out the
water would filter out through the structure, and a certain number fish were left. It
wasn't that efficient; it might catch 10% of the fish that were schooling around. But for a subsistence culture, if you caught five or ten percent of what was there,
that was enough for a daily catch. And the thought was that these were
built by family groups, so maybe 35-50 people in a
family clan. It'd be the kids, the grandparents, the parents, everybody would be sort of involved
in making this, and they would have it for during the
spawning season, so most of May into June, and they would leave it, and
the next year they would come back and maintain it. And from what we know, over here in Back Bay there are fishweir sticks from 3700-5200 years ago. So the people who were
here were maintaining and building the things for fifteen hundred
years. Have we maintained
anything in our Western culture for fifteen hundred years, really? So that's why I'm so excited about these fishweirs. .

The Perfect Travel Lens: Exploring Photography with Mark Wallace – In this episode I will explain to you
why I've learned that the 35mm lens is the perfect
lens for travel photography.
presents Exploring Photography with Mark Wallace. Hi everybody welcome to this week's
episode of Exploring Photography right here on AdoramaTV. I'm Mark Wallace. I’ve been traveling the world for about 13 months now. I haven't been back to the United States the entire time. A lot of people ask me on Facebook and through my blog. Can you tell us what's working and what isn't working? Well absolutely, that's what this episode
is about what I learned in my past year, a little over a year of
travel and travel photography. Well I started shooting with a DSLR
systematic Canon 5D mark III with a few lenses. Then about of five or six months ago I
switched over to a rangefinder camera and so what I wanted to do is see, well
did that switch which work for me and which lenses are working for me, what worked
with the Canon system what didn’t? All that kinda stuff and so the way I
wanted to approach this is to do something that Jared Platt
thought me how to do that is to. I'll dive into Lightroom and look at the statistics and find out
what the numbers are telling me. If you don’t know how to do that you can check an episode that I previously made all about meta data and how to learn
from it. Well let's figure out what I've learned from my travel. The first thing I wanted
to know is which lenses do I tend to favor. Which ones work best for me, and my criteria for judging that was
when I throw pictures into Lightroom all the pictures that I put in there
which ones, or how many am I flagging. How many am I picking, saying ya this is a winning photo so I looked in Lightroom, I look at
all the lenses and you can see that the data shows that the 21mm, the 16-35mm lens, the 24-70mm at the wide side of that lens, my success rate is about 11 or 12
percent. In other words I'm getting more good
shots out of my wide angle lenses then I am with my telephoto lenses. At
the 135mm and the 70-200mm side, the long end of that lens. My success rate drops to about
eight-percent. So, wide-angle lenses for travel photography are clearly better by about a 4% margin,
which isn't huge. But I learned a little bit more as I
looked closely, more closely at this data. The other
thing I wanted to know was let's take a look at me Canon versus
the Leica argument. Don't get caught up on Leica it could be
any rangefinder or mirrorless camera, a Sony a7R. It could be a Fujifilm, anyone of the many awesome cameras that they have. It could be anything. So I chose a Leica but it could be any mirrorless camera. So a light weight
small camera versus a DSLR camera. When I looked at the data of all the images
I shot with my Canon system versus the rangefinder system, they were equal. In terms of winning percentage. In other words about 10% or exactly 10% of the images that I shot with both systems came out as winners. So they're on equal footing as far as the image quality and the
images that I liked. I didn't compare the Leica versus the
Canon so it's not that comparison, but just looking equally, I liked about the same amount of photos. One of the things that I really hoped
for in a smaller camera and I talked a lot about this in a previous episode was that the larger system I had no camera
in hand, in other words I just wasn't shooting a lot because my camera was always in my bag or leave I'd it at the hotel. So my hope was with a smaller camera
like this that I would take it with me a lot more
and so I wanted to see am I shooting more, and if so does that translate into more
winning shots, and absolutely I am shooting a lot more and when I
looked in, looked closely at the data I see
that I on my DSLR camera, on my Canon camera, I was taking about 44 winning photos per month and with my rangefinder I'm
shooting at about 75 winning photos per month. That's a170% increase in winning photos and because both of them have the the
same success rate all that means is that I'm shooting more
pictures with my small camera that I am with my large camera. Which is a sort of a no brainer. Of course if you take a small camera you're going to use it more then a big camera that you have to carry around and it might also be that I'm
sorta have new toy joy and so I'm just using this a lot
more than my other camera. I don't know but the data says that I'm shooting with
this camera more than my larger camera. Alright well now
that we know that, my question is will which lenses are the best. We already know that I’m favoring wide angle lenses which was sort of a surprise to me because for years
I've been saying long lenses, long lenses, long lenses. Well let's look and see. So in both
systems, the Canon system and my rangefinder system I used, if you take everything and put it
together and average it. Not average, it’s added up. 51%
of all the photos were shot with a 35mm range and wider. So I looked at my 24-70mm and said how many of those were 35mm or wider. My 16-35mm, I added those in there and then my 21mm and my 35mm Leica lenses and so 51%. But I wanted to see how exactly that
broke down just looking at my rangefinder camera. So when I look at that it's still about the same about 54% of the shots are shot with a 35mm
lens or wider. Except I didn't have this 35mm lens until about three months ago. So I was very curious, I
wanted to see what happened three months ago when I added this lens. Now the reason I bought this lens was
because I was shooting a lot with my 21mm lens but just every day shooting it felt just too wide, too
much in the frame. So I go back and forth
between that and my 50mm lens, my standard lens. But the 50mm felt a little bit to long, a
little bit too close, a little bit to cropped. So I just wasn't happy with either
one of those and so I read a lot of blogs and a did a lot of research
and peopled swear by the 35mm lens.
Steve Huff Photos one go those guys says if you just shoot with this and nothing
else, it will dramatically increase your skills. I wanted to see, well maybe that's true so I bought my 35mm lens. And wow what a change. We look at the
data after I bought the 35mm. 79% all of my photos were shot with a 35mm or the 21mm. So it’s a dramatic shift between these lenses and these
lenses. So almost exclusively I'm shooting wide. Why, why is that? While the 35mm is just the right porridge. It's not too wide, it's not too
long and you can stick it on your lens, you can carry it around. It’s very, very small. At night if you don't need a lens hood you can see this is a very compact small lens, it's not intimidating. it
works for portrait photography, you can shoot scenic’s with it, you can do anything with this lens. In fact I can take all these lenses and leave them at home in a bag and just use the 35mm and I will be successful. I wanted to
look at the data to see what it said. Of the two lenses sure enough,
66% of them were shot with this 35mm lens. So the takeaway on the things that I've
learned in my last 13 months is this: you should travel with a small
camera that has a 35mm lens
because you're gonna shoot more with it. It's a lens that you can do almost
anything you want with and because they're so readily available for
all different brands Sony, Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Fuji-film, you name it they all have 35mm lenses. They're all very affordable, all way up
to skyrocket high prices but you can get low light performance, you can get scenic performance, there really sharp, there awesome. You can get old
35mm vintage lenses, you can get brand new lenses. They are everywhere and so what I've
learned is the 35mm lens coupled with a mirrorless camera is
absolutely the way to go. So if you're looking for a
solution, a one lens solution, or a starting point. Get a mirrorless camera, get a 35mm lens and go for it. That's what I've learned in my last 13 months. Well there you have it. Thank you so much for joining me on this episode of Exploring Photography.
Don't forget there's a tone of information on Adorama TV. It's absolutely free and all you need to do is subscribe so you don’t miss a single episode. So click on the subscribe button and you can look back at past episodes like how to learn from your meta data and do the kind of number crunching that I just did as well as shooting with
wide-angle lenses and all kinds of things it's absolutely free so check that out.
Thanks again for joining me and I will see you again next time. Do you want great-looking prints at low-cost? Be sure to visit our easy to
use online printing service. Adorama pixs has professionals who treat your images with the utmost care that you can count
on. For a quick turnaround on photos, cards or albums use .

Physical vs Chemical Sunscreen | Sunscreen 101 🧴☀️ – Hey everyone! It's your girl, Jacquelyn.
Di video ini — seperti yang mungkin kalian sudah ketahui dari judulnya — aku akan membahas tentang sunscreen. Jadi, apa itu UVA dan UVB, apa arti dari SPF dan PA+++, dan perbedaan antara physical dan chemical sunscreen. Karena aku tahu durasi video ini akan panjang banget, jadi aku udah sediakan time stamps di kolom deskripsi, jadi kalian bisa pilih yang mana yang mau kalian tonton. Jadi kalian tidak perlu menonton full satu video, karena aku tahu ini bisa jadi ngebosenin buat kalian. Akan tetapi, kalau kalian nonton dari awal sampai akhir…. Terima kasih banyaaak! Aku sangat menghargai itu :)) Sebelum aku masuk ke videonya, jangan lupa untuk follow instagram aku kalau kalian ingin lebih update tentang kehidupanku. Itu saja intronya, dan tanpa basa-basi lagi, aku kita mulai videonya. Oke, pertama-tama, aku akan bahas tentang UVA dan UVB. Kalian pasti sudah pernah dengar istilah tersebut. Kalau belum…. Kemana aja kalian selama ini???? Di dunia skincare, UVA dan UVB terkenal karena dampak buruknya kepada kulit, dan cara tergampang untuk mengingat efeknya adalah UVA, A = aging (penuaan dini) dan UV, B = burning (terbakar) Sekarang aku akan bahas tentang UVA terlebih dahulu. Jadi, UVA punya panjang gelombang lebih tinggi, sehingga bisa menembus jendela dan awan. Oleh karena itu, kalian harus tetap menggunakan sunscreen meskipun di dalam ruangan. Karena ya itu, UVA bisa menembus awan dan jendela. UVA lebih menembus dari UVB, jadi bisa memberi efek kepada sel yang jauh di dalam kulit. UVA juga bisa memberi efek tidak langsung ke DNA UVA bisa membuat kulit mengalami penuaan dini, seperti yang sudah aku bilang A = aging, yang mana akan bertuju kepada efek fisik seperti kerutan. UVA juga terasosiasikan dengan beberapa kanker kulit. Jadi, kalau kalian tidak ingin mengalami semua itu, pake sunscreen yaa 🙂 Sekarang kita beralih ke UVB. Jadi, UVB panjang gelombangnya lebih rendah dari UVA. UVB merusak lapisan kulit yang paling luar, makanya bisa membuat kulit terbakar. UVB merusak DNA secara langsung dan penyebab dari kebayakan kanker kulit, tapi mereka juga bisa berkontribusi dalam penuaan dini kulit. UVB tidak menembus jendela karena kemungkinan besar sudah difilter oleh awan. Sekarang, aku mau bahas tentang apasih SPF dan PA itu? Jadi, hampir semua botol sunscreen memiliki tulisan "SPF" dan "PA", seperti SPF 30 / SPF 50, PA+++, atau PA++ Tapi apakah kalian pernah bertanya, apasih maksudnya SPF sama PA itu? Jadi, SPF mengindikasikan level proteksi dari sinar UVB, sedangkan PA mengindikasikan level proteksi dari sinar UVA. Jadi itu guys, penjelasannya 😉 "Tipe-Tipe Sunscreen" Tipe sunscreen ada 2, yaitu physical sunscreen, atau bisa disebut juga sebagai mineral sunscreen, dan chemical sunscreen. Pertama, aku akan bahas tentang physical / mineral sunscreen. Seperti yang sudah aku sebut sebelumnya kalau physical sunscreen dikenal juga sebagai mineral sunscreen, karena berbahan dasar mineral. Bahan aktifnya adalah zinc oxide dan titanium dioxide (berakhir -ide) Kalau kalian misalnya pengen tahu, "ini sunscreen jenisnya apa ya?" bisa cek ingredients listnya dan kalau ada "-ide", ada kemungkinan sunscreen itu adalah physical sunscreen (tapi harus cek ingredients lainnya juga ya). Kalian mungkin bertanya-tanya, gimana sih cara kerjanya physical sunscreen? Jadi, physical sunscreen membentuk semacam lapisan proteksi di kulit (cara kerjanya seperti tameng) dan memantulkan kembali sinar UVA serta UVB agar tidak menembus kulit. Anggap saja ini (tangan kanan) adalah sinar UVA dan UVB dan ini physical sunscreen (tangan kiri) yang cara kerjanya seperti tameng Jadi UVA dan UVB terpancar dan physical sunscreen memantulkan sinar tersebut, sehingga tidak menembus kulit. Physical sunscreen juga langsung efektif setelah diaplikasikan ke kulit, jadi setelah kalian pakai bisa langsung beraktivitas di bawah matahari. Sekarang aku akan bahas kelebihan dan kekurangan dari physical sunscreen. Kelebihan pertama: mampu memantulkan kembali UVA dan UVB. Seperti yang bisa kalian lihat dari foto ini, Zinc Oxide, yang mana termasuk dalam bahan aktif physical sunscreen, berfungsi dengan baik untuk melindungi kulit dari sinar UVA dan UVB. Kelebihan kedua adalah physical sunscreen tetap membuat kulit dingin / tidak panas. Kenapa? Karena Zinc Oxide memantulkan panas dan energi dari sinar matahari dari kulit, sehingga mampu mengurangi temperatur panas. Karena alasan ini lah physical sunscreen lebih unggul dalam mengurangi resiko kulit terbakar dan kemerahan yang terasosiakan dengan jerawat, rosacea, dan kesensitivitan kulit. Kelebihan ketiga: physical sunscreen tidak terlaulu mengiritasi kulit sehingga cocok untuk semua tipe kulit. Seperti yang sudah aku bilang sebelumnya bahwa physical sunscreen membuat kulit menjadi tidak panas sehingga tidak terlalu mengiritasi kulit. Kelebihan keempat: noncomedogenic dan hypoallergenic (kemungkinan besar tidak menyumbat pori-pori dan menyebabkan iritasi) Physical sunscreen itu noncomedogenic karena tidak terserap ke kulit (hanya berdiri di lapisan luar kulit) sehingga tidak menyebabkan komedo ke muka kalian. Sebenarnya bukan tidak memberi komedo sih, tapi lebih tepatnya resikonya cukup minim untuk pori-pori tersumbat karena memakai physical sunscreen. Sekarang aku akan sebut kekurangan physical sunscreen. Yang pertama — aku yakin kalian sudah tahu yang satu ini — physical sunscreen memberikan efek white cast, membuat beberapa formula kurang cocok untuk kulit yang berwarna sawo matang atau bahkan lebih gelap. Tapi, ada kabar baik, karena belakangan sudah cukup banyak physical sunscreen yang memiliki formula sangat bagus sehingga white castnya sangat minim. Mungkin beberapa masih ada white cast, tapi karena sangat tipis jadi tidak terlalu kelihatan. Jadi merupakan kabar gembira buat kalian yang berkulit eksotis! 😉 Kalau kalian ingin tahu produknya apa saja, tenang, aku akan bahas nanti. Jadi tonton terus yaa Bisa disebut kabar baik juga, beberapa physical sunscreen memiliki tint (warna) sehingga bisa terlihat lebih natural. Contohnya seperti Acnes UV Tint. Seperti yang bisa kalian lihat, produk ini memiliki warna sehingga dapat membantu meminimalisir white cast (jujur buat kalian yang berkulit sawo matang atau lebih gelap mungkin masih keliatan white castnya) Kekurangan kedua: physical sunscreen mudah pudar apabila digosok, dibilas, atau kena keringat. jadi kalian harus rajin reaplly apalagi kalau di luar ruangan dan tarpapar langsung sinar matahari. Kekurangan ketiga: level protektifnya akan berkurang jika tidak di reapply dengan benar karena sinar UV bisa menembus kulit melalui celah antar molekul. Jadi, penting banget untuk reapply sunscreen kalian secara benar, agar sinar UV tidak bisa menembus kulit kalian lewat celah antar molekul. Itu dia penjelasan aku tentang physical sunscreen, dan sekarang aku akan bahas tentang chemical sunscreen. Chemical sunscreen berbahan dasar karbon, jadi tidak seperti physical sunscreen yang berbahan dasar mineral. Bahan aktifnya adalah… Maaf ya kalau ada salah baca , karena aku bukan ilmuwan atau semacamnya hehehe Jadi bahan aktifnya banyak yang berakhir -one, seperti oxybenzONE, avobenzONE dan juga -ate seperti octisalATE, homosalATE. Jadi ingat belakangnya aja biar gampang Physical sunscreen kan "berdiri" di atas kulit, sedangkan chemical sunscreen itu terserap oleh kulit. Jadi dia menyerap UVA dan UVB kemudian mengubah mereka menjadi gelombang dan panas yang tidak berbahaya/merusak kulit. Terus nanti gelombang dan panas ini akan dikeluarkan/pantulkan kembali oleh kulit (jadi semacam ngumpul, filter, masuk kulit, lalu kembali dilepaskan) Makanya kalau kalian pakai chemical sunscreen bakal kerasa hangat gitu mukanya, ya karena cara kerjanya yang seperti itu. Untuk efektivitasnya, kalian harus nunggu sekitar 20-30 menit agar sunscreennya jadi efektif. Jadi kalian ngga bisa setelah aplikasikan chemical sunscreen dan langsung beraktivitas di bawah matahari, karena sunscreennya belum efektif (alhasil kulit tidak dilindungi secara benar) Sekarang aku akan bahas kelebihan dan kekurangan dari chemical sunscreen. Kelebihan pertama: biasanya teksturnya tipis dan ringan jadi mudah diratakan. Karena teksturnya tipis dan ngga ada white cast, kalian bisa gosok selama 30 detik dan bakal udah merata sunscreennya. Sedangkan kalau kalian pakai physical sunscreen, bisa jadi mengeluarkan usaha ekstra karena harus meratakan white castnya agar terlihat natural. Kelebihan kedua, seperti yang sudah aku sebut, dia tidak memiliki white cast Kelebihan ketiga: kemungkinan lebih kecil untuk adanya jarak antar molekul setelah diaplikasikan ke kulit. Kekurangan yang pertama — kekurangan ini cukup terkenal — adalah chemical sunscreen memberikan dampak kepada biota laut dan memutihnya terumbu karang. Kekurangan ini sangat populer, bahkan sampai membuat reputasi chemical sunscreen menjadi cukup buruk. Karena banyak yang bilang (bahkan di artikel-artikel) semacam "jangan pakai chemical sunscreen, pakai physical sunscreen aja karena chemical sunscreen merusak terumbu karang!" Tetapi, kenyataannya tidaklah seperti itu. Kalian harus memiliki kekhawatiran ini kalau kalian akan berenang atau menyelam dimana terumbu karang hidup (atau kalau kalian bener-bener tinggal di pantai) Kalau kalian stay di rumah kayak aku, seharusnya itu tidak menjadi kekhawatiran utama kalian. Karena tidak ada bukti valid yang menyatakan bahwa chemical sunscreen merusak terumbu karang. Terlebih lagi, kalau kita melihat secara keseluruhan, ternyata kemungkinan chemical sunscreen untuk merusak terumbu karang itu sangatlah kecil. Aku akan tunjukkan kepada kalian klip video dari Lab Muffin Beauty Science karena ia memiliki gelar PhD untuk kimia dan jelas bahwa ia lebih tahu / banyak ilmunya dibanding dengan aku. Jadi, ini dia klipnya. "Terlebih lagi, kalau kita melihat secara keseluruhan, ternyata kemungkinan chemical sunscreen untuk merusak terumbu karang itu sangatlah kecil." "Dalam buku dan review terkini tentang coral bleaching (memutihnya terumbu karang), sunscreen bahkan tidak pantas untuk disebut." "Hal ini karena banyak sekali data yang menunjukkan bahwa perubahan iklim dan manajemen agrikultur memiliki dampak yang jauh lebih besar terhadap coral bleaching." "Seorang ahli terumbu karang berkata ia akan menulis chemical sunscreen di urutan ke-200 dalam list hal-hal yang merusak terumbu karang akibat perbuatan manusia." "Ia juga menunjuk bahwa kejadian coral bleaching terburuk terjadi di area dimana turis tidak kunjungi (tempat terpencil)." "Contohnya adalah pada saat fenomena coral bleaching massal di The Great Barrier Reef pada tahun 2016." "Sejauh itu, daerah yang mengalami coral bleaching terparah terletak di bagian utara, yang mana termasuk daerah terpencil." "Pola bleaching tersebut ternyata berada di daerah yang memiliki suhu air yang tinggi, yang mana disebabkan oleh perubahan iklim." "Dua periset juga berkata bahwa 'kerusakan' karena chemical sunscreen itu dapat diabaikan kalau kalian melihat bagaimana perubahan iklim sangat mengancam terumbu karang." "Mereka juga berkata bahwa kalau kalian ingin melakukan sesuatu untuk menyelamatkan terumbu karang dan laut, kalian seharusnya jangan terlalu mengkhawatirkan dampak dari chemical sunscreen." "Melarang penggunaan sunscreen dengan alasan untuk menyelamatkan terumbu karang itu ibaratnya seperti kalian menyusun ulang kursi tempat berjemur di Titanic, atau seperti menyemir goresan di pintu kalian saat rumah kalian terbakar." Jujur, saat aku mengetahui hal ini, aku kaget banget, kayak what? Jadi efeknya ngga terlalu besar? Okay, kita balik lagi ke kekurangan chemical sunscreen, dan kekurangan kedua adalah: chemical sunscreen berpotensi untuk menimbulkan/menambahkan atau memperjelas flek di muka karena membuat kulit kita lebih hangat. Kok bisa? Karena kulit yang terlalu panas bisa membuat flek menjadi lebih parah. Kekurangan ketiga: meningkatnya resiko iritasi dan sensasi menyengat, terutama untuk yang memiliki kulit sensitif dengan skin barrier rusak. Hal ini terjadi karena gabungan beberapa ingredients agar bisa melindungi kulit dari sinar UVA dan UVB. Kekurangan keempat: semakin tinggi level SPF (seperti SPF 50 atau bahkan lebih), semakin tinggi pula resiko kulit menjadi iritasi untuk kulit sensitif. Kekurangan terakhir: berpotensi untuk menyumbat pori-pori buat kalian yang memiliki tipe kulit berminyak. Kenapa? Karena seperti yang sudah aku sebut tadi kalau chemical sunscreen itu diserap oleh kulit, makanya bisa menyumbat pori-pori buat yang tipe kulitnya berminyak. Udah capek belom dengerin aku ngomong mulu? karena aku c a p e k 🙂 dan haus juga wkwkwk tapi kita bakal lanjuttt! Sekarang aku akan memberi kalian contoh produk yang merupakan physical sunscreen dan chemical sunscreen. Contoh produk physical sunscreen: Sekarang aku bakal kasih tahu produk physical sunscreen yang direkomendasikan oleh Hyram karena white castnya minim. Produk yang direkomendasikan adalah: Mungkin kalian bertanya juga, "Tapi Hyram kan kulitnya ngga sawo matang, kenapa dia bisa rekomendasikan produk-produk tersebut untuk yang berkulit gelap?" Jadi, Hyram juga sudah menonton beberapa video dari konten kreator yang berkulit sawo matang atau bahkan lebih gelap yang membahas sunscreen, Jadi dia sudah melihat bukti bahwa "Oh, produk ini ternyata memang cocok untuk orang yang berkulit sawo matang atau bahkan lebih gelap." Jadi tidak perlu khawatir karena sudah di tes oleh konten kreator yang berkulit gelap. Aku juga bakal sediakan link di kolom deskripsi untuk videonya Hyram dan video dari konten kreator lainnya tentang sunscreen. Oh iya, videonya Lab Muffin Beauty Science juga bakal aku sediakan linknya, siapa tahu ada dari kalian yang tartarik tentang topik hubungan chemical sunscreen dan memutihnya terumbu karang. Sekarang kita beralih ke contoh-contoh produk chemical sunscreen. Produknya adalah: Tapi aku kurang rekomen sunscreen emina karena mengandung alkohol dan parfum, yang mana kurang baik untuk kulit. Selanjutnya ada: Jujur aku kurang rekomen juga dua produk ini karena ingredientsnya bukan yang terbaik untuk kulit. Aku masukin soalnya benar-benar buat contoh aja (soalnya mereka kan terkenal). Contoh lainnya: Jadi itu dia guys, Sunscreen 101 dari aku huehue Aku harap kalian belajar banyak dari video ini dan jangan lupa untuk kasih like kalau video ini bermanfaat. Dan seperti yang sudah aku bilang tadi, aku bakal sediakan link untuk semua video yang kusebut dan artikel yang sudah kubaca. dan juga link untuk produk-produk yang aku sebut di video ini (sudah aku beri contoh lainnya juga). Link tersebut termasuk link afiliasi, artinya kalau kalian beli produk melalui link affiliasi aku, aku bakal dapat komisi dalam jumlah kecil dan itu akan sangat membantu aku untuk membuat konten yang lebih baik lagi. Oh iya, kalau kalian ada kritik/saran atau ide video yang kalian ingin aku buat nanti, bisa ditulis di kolom komentar yaa! dan tentunya kalau kalian suka dengan konten yang aku bikin, jangan lupa untuk subscribe yaa, gratis kok 😀 jangan lupa untuk pencet lonceng nya juga agar kalian selalu mendapat notifikasi setiap kali aku upload video baru. Itu saja, terima kasih banyak karena sudah menonton, dan aku akan bertemu kalian lagi di video selanjutnya. Bye-bye! .